Plessy vs. Ferguson Plessy went to court and argued that the Separate gondola car Act violated the ordinal and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The judge, a Massachusetts lawyer, was John Howard Ferguson. He had previously declared the Separate Car Act "unconstitutional on trains that traveled through several states." However, in regards to the Plessy trial, he emit that Louisiana could regulate railroad companies that only operated within its state. Ferguson contribute aground Plessy discredited of refusing to leave the white car. Plessy obstinate to draw in the conclusion to the commanding Court of Louisiana, but that court upheld Fergusons opinion.
Plessy then(prenominal) decided to take his case to the United States Supreme Court. In 1896, The Supreme Court of the United States found Homer Plessy guilty erstwhile again. Justice Henry Brown, the speaker for the eight-person majority, wrote: "That [the Separate Car Act] does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery...is...If you want to get a honest essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment